Legal Opinion
Zachery v. McWilliams
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 10, 1972No. Civ. 13371PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.
Mr. and Mrs. Zachery, the plaintiffs, own section 28 of a township located in. a rugged mountainous area of Kern County. Immediately to the west is section 29, owned by defendant McWilliams. In this suit the parties litigate the location of the common boundary of these sections, that is, the west boundary of section 28 and east boundary of section 29. The trial court found that the parties’ predecessors had established an agreed boundary about 1,300 feet west of the section line established by an 1876 government survey. The court granted a decree quieting…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Ernie v. Trinity Lutheran ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Clapp v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Mello v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Nusbickel v. Stevens Ranch Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Armitage v. DeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Kunza v. GaskellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Mesnick v. CatonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Simpson Redwood Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Humphrey v. FutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.