Legal Opinion

Fallert v. Hamilton

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1952No. Civ. 4374PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Action for ejectment and for damages for claimed wrongful withholding of a strip of land containing approximately 4.6 acres.

Plaintiff J. A. Fallert and wife purchased a tract of land in Tulare County on December 12, 1950, from one Reeves. On the north it adjoined a tract purchased on January 12, 1948, by defendants Claude Hamilton and his wife.

A licensed engineer testified that he was familiar with the various properties involved; that he made a survey of the Reeves property in 1949, and established the north line of it; that in February, 1951, the redwood marker which he had placed there…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Clapp v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Mello v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Roberts v. BraeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pistorius v. Prudential Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Downing v. BoehringerIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Meacci v. KochergenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Pra v. BradshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API