Legal Opinion
Van Buskirk v. Todd
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 1969No. Civ. 32270PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReppy, J.
Defendant and appellant Todd appeals from a judgment decreeing paternity and requiring support of a minor child.
The mother of the child in question, Shirley Van Buskirk (Shirley), was the plaintiff in the action. In her complaint she alleged her relationship to the child but did not state specifically in the caption or body of the complaint that the action was brought on behalf of the child; nor did she designate that it was brought under any specific statutory authority; nor did she have separate counts for the issue of paternity and the issue of support. At the trial, which was before the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Williams v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Fernandez v. AburreaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Rodríguez Avilés v. Rodríguez BeruffSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
- Schultz v. HarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Ruddock v. OhlsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.