Legal Opinion

Meads v. North Carolina Department of Agriculture

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 31, 1998No. 139A98PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Justice.

We are asked in this appeal to determine whether the North Carolina Pesticide Board properly penalized an aerial pesticide applicator for violating various North Carolina pesticide regulations. On initial review, our Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s reversal of the Pesticide Board’s decision. Finding error, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the Pesticide Board’s decision.

On 26 August 1994, petitioner H. Ray Meads (“Meads”) aerially sprayed the pesticide Pounce on James Duncan’s (“Duncan”) soybean field located on S.R. 1148 1 in Currituck…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Thompson v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Harrah Independent School District v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Dobrowolska Ex Rel. Dobrowolska v. WallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Affordable Care, Inc. v. North Carolina State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API