Legal Opinion

Jones v. Sibley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1961No. 38942PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs brought this action against the defendant for the return of $700 “earnest money” that they had deposited with said defendant, a real estate broker, in connection with a contract to sell their property located at 449 South 92nd East Avenue, Tulsa, Oklahoma. Plaintiffs pleaded that defendant had wholly failed to comply with the provisions of the ref erred-to' contract by effecting a sale of the plaintiffs’ property within the time fixed by the contract.

In her “Answer and Counterclaim”, defendant pleaded in substance that during the time the contract was in force and effect said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. FloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Bullard v. CaulkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Graff v. HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Grigg v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Roadway Express, Inc. v. GordonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foglesong v. Thurston National Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Tulsa Auto Dealers Auction v. North Side State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Miller v. Industrial Welding and Supply CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API