Legal Opinion
Bullard v. Caulk
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 16, 1951No. 34297PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The parties herein occupy the same relative positions as in the trial court and hereafter they will be referred to as they there appeared.
Plaintiffs brought action against D. N. Caulk and Lloyd Reagan for cancellation of a contract to sell them real property, alleging, among other things, that after all payments on the contract had been made and prior to instituting the action, they had made due demand for conveyance to them by an abstract warranty deed according to the contract the following described property, to wit:
N% of SWy4 Lot 7 and S% of SWV4 of Lot 7, Section 6, Twp. 11N, Range IE,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lee v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ShirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Central Mortgage Co. v. Michigan State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Truax v. Capitol Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Liberty Nat. Bank of Pawhuska v. ExendineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Trimble v. City of MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Bradley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- American-First Title & Trust Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- United Engines, Inc. v. McConnell Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.