Legal Opinion
Foglesong v. Thurston National Life Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 25, 1976No. 48432PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Vice Chief Justice.
This action was brought by Robert N. Foglesong and George F. Harrington (dissenting shareholders) for the sole purpose of determining the fair value of shares of common stock held by them in Thurston National Life Insurance Company (Life Company) and Thurston National Insurance Company (Casualty Company). A judicial determination of the value of the stock was necessary because the parties failed to agree on the value of the shares held by the dissenting shareholders who had objected to a merger and consolidation action approved by the majority of the corporations’…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tome Land & Improvement Co. v. SilvaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Sporborg v. City Specialty Stores, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
- City of Tulsa v. CreekmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- American General Corp. v. CampCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Sporborg v. City Specialty StoresCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Armstrong v. Marathon Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Multitex Corp. v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- New Mexico Banquest Investors Corp. v. Peters Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- NM BANQUEST INVESTORS v. Peters Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Quick v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.