Rhudy v. Bottlecaps Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice.
In this appeal, we hold that a bar owner did not owe a duty either to warn or protect its patrons from criminal acts that occurred on another landowner’s property. The bar patrons in this case were the victims of a robbery and murder that occurred when they parked their car in a public lot behind the bar. Although the bar management was aware of crime in the area, they encouraged prospective patrons to come, noting “free parking directly behind” the bar. Nevertheless, plaintiffs failed to produce facts sufficient to create an inference that the bar owner controlled the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Jardel Co., Inc. v. HughesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- Arnold v. Society for Sayings Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Mostert v. CBL & AssociatesWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Ember v. B.F.D., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Aeroglobal Capital Management, LLC v. Cirrus Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Newell v. Montana West, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Anderson v. Krafft-Murphy Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Motorola, Inc. v. Amkor Technology, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Rizzitiello v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.