Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Krafft-Murphy Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 26, 2013No. 85, 2013PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Justice:

I. INTRODUCTION

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Chancery in an action to appoint a receiver for Krafft-Murphy Company, Inc. (the “Corporation”), a dissolved Delaware corporation, under 8 Del. C. § 279. The Petitioners-Below/Appellants, who are tort claimants in lawsuits pending against the Corporation in other jurisdictions, seek the appointment of a receiver to enable them lawfully to pursue those claims against the Corporation in those other courts. The Corporation (as Respondent-Below/Appellee) argues that because it holds no assets other than unexhausted…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City Investing Co. Liquidating Trust v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  2. LaPoint v. AmerisourceBergen Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Delaware Bay Surgical Services, P.A. v. SwierSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. Blankenship v. Demmler Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. In Re Citadel Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Miramar Marine, Inc. v. Citi Walk Development Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2017
  2. Robert Strougo v. Aaron P. HollanderCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
  3. Advanced Video Technologies, LLC v. HTC Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. Colón Vázquez y otros v. Báez Pérez y otrosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2024
  5. Pellicone v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 2014

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API