Legal Opinion
Kallio v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 22, 1986No. C4-85-2126PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
The jury returned a verdict for respondent Robert Kallio in his suit against appellant Ford Motor Company that alleged that both the design and accompanying warnings for the transmission on his Ford pickup truck were defective. On appeal, Ford argues that the trial court erred: (1) when it allowed Kallio’s design defect claim to go to the jury and refused Ford’s requested instructions; (2) when it allowed Kallio’s failure to warn claim to go to the jury and refused Ford’s requested instructions; and (3) when it admitted evidence of subsequent design modifications and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ault v. International Harvester Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Lee v. Crookston Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Bogosian v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. And Daimler-Benz North America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- General Motors Corp. v. MoseleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Kallio v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- THS Northstar Associates v. WR Grace & Co.-Conn.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- General Motors Corp. v. MoseleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.