Legal Opinion

Ault v. International Harvester Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1974No. L.A. 30115PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

Plaintiff was injured in an accident involving a motor vehicle known as a “Scout,” manufactured by defendant. He brought an action alleging that the accident was caused by a defect in the design of the vehicle, asserting that he was entitled to recovery under theories of strict liability, breach of warranty, and negligence.

The gear box of the Scout involved in the accident was manufactured of aluminum 380, a material which plaintiff asserts was defective for that purpose. At the trial evidence established that after the accident defendant changed from aluminum 380 to malleable…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Donnelly v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API