Legal Opinion
THS Northstar Associates v. WR Grace & Co.-Conn.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 1, 1994No. Civ. 3-87-676PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RENNER, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The above-entitled action came on for trial before the undersigned and a jury between October 26 and December 21, 1993. On December 17, the jury returned a verdict finding that defendant W.R. Grace (“Grace”) failed to use reasonable care in designing Monokote 3, an asbestos-containing material used to fireproof the Northstar Center, and breached a duty to warn T.H.S. Northstar (“Northstar”) of the hazards associated with Monokote 3. The jury found that W.R. Grace did not commit fraud against North-star. The jury awarded…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Springrose v. WillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Armstrong v. MailandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Mony LEICHIHMAN, Appellant, v. PICKWICK INTERNATIONAL and American Can Company, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fair Isaac Corp. v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Luigino's Inc. v. Pezrow CompaniesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Milhauser v. Minco Products, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Select Comfort Corporation v. BaxterDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018