Jurgenson v. Diller
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County and from an order refusing a new trial. John C. Gray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
Action to enforce an alleged lien for labor on certain mining claims, together called the John Dix mine. Defendant became the owner by purchase at a sale of the ground on foreclosure of mortgage, and the sheriff’s subsequent deed therefor executed March 4, 1888. One Dix had previously been the owner, and after said March 4th he asked and obtained leave of defendant to remain on the premises, promising to take care of the same and make no expense for defendant. Without authority from the latter, Dix proceeded to work the mine, and hired plaintiff for this purpose. Under such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williams v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of Balt.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Avery v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Donohoe v. Trinity Consolidated Gold & Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Higgins v. Carlotta Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Reese v. Bald Mountain Consolidated Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Albuquerque Lumber Co. v. Montevista Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Leoni v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Larson v. HenriksenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.