Legal Opinion
Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc. v. Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 30, 1999No. Civil 99-193 (RCL)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on Plaintiffs Motion [13] to Remand for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Defendant Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s Motion [12] for a Stay Pending Multidistrict Coordination. Upon consideration of these motions and the applicable oppositions, replies, and supplemental submissions, the court will DENY plaintiffs motion to remand and GRANT defendant Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s motion for a stay pending multidistrict coordination.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff originally filed this action in the Superior Court of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re Ford Motor Company Citibank South Dakota)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- McCauley v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- In Re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Kopff v. World Research Group, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc. v. Hoechst AktiengesellschaftDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.