Legal Opinion
Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc. v. Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 9, 1999No. Civil Action 99-2034-KHVPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ Motion To Remand For Lack Of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. # 16) filed March 8, 1999; Defendant, Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s Motion To Stay Proceedings (Doc. # 8) filed February 19, 1999; and Hoechst Marion Roussel’s Motion To Join Andrx Pharmaceuticals Motion To Stay Proceedings (Doc. # 13) filed March 2, 1999. 1 For reasons stated below, the motions of plaintiffs and Hoechst Marion Roussel are sustained, and the motion by Andrx is denied.
Facts
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (“HMR”) manufactures…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Meyers v. Bayer AGDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2001
- In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Greene v. WyethDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.