Legal Opinion
McCauley v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 6, 2001No. Nos. 99-36115, 99-36206PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Ford Motor Company (Ford) and Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. (Citibank) appeal from the district court’s order dismissing the consolidated complaint of several underlying state court lawsuits under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and remanding these state suits to the courts from which they were removed. We must decide two questions. First, whether the minimum amount in controversy required to maintain a diversity suit in federal court ($75,000) is present in the consolidated action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 to review the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- In Re Ford Motor Company Citibank South Dakota)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Witte v. General Nutrition CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Veoh Networks, Inc. v. UMG Recordings, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2007
- Brooke v. Kashl Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
- Wright v. Incline Village General Improvement DistrictDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.