Kopff v. World Research Group, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs allege that beginning in February 2002 defendants unlawfully transmitted to plaintiffs’ fax machine 26 unsolicited advertisements promoting various events without plaintiffs’ consent. Notice of Removal, Ex. N, Amended Complaint ¶¶ 14-17. In May 2002, plaintiffs sent a letter through counsel objecting to the transmissions, to no avail. See id. ¶ 19. In response to the faxes, plaintiffs filed suit in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. 1 Plaintiffs made three claims against the defendants: (1) violations of Section 227(b) of the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Travelers Property Casualty v. GoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Landsman & Funk PC v. Skinder-Strauss AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers v. Insurance Co. of the WestDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Downey v. Ambassador Development, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Kavu, Inc. v. Omnipak Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.