Legal Opinion

People v. Terrill

California Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1900No. Crim. No. 634PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion. Tirey L. Ford, Attorney General, George A. Sturtevant, Deputy Attorney General, and James H. Campbell, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is an appeal by the people from an order of the court below granting a motion to set aside the information.

The main ground of the motion was that prior to the information respondent had not been legally committed by a magistrate. What is called the “transcript on appeal” shows what purport to be a large number of affidavits and other papers and testimony given and proceedings had at the preliminary examination; but there is no bill of exceptions authenticating these matters, and therefore there is nothing before us into which we can look to see whether the order appealed from was, or was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Somers v. SomersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Borkheim v. North British & Mercantile Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Pieper v. Centinela Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Walsh v. HutchingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Linforth v. S.F. Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. People v. LonnenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. People v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. People v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API