Somers v. Somers
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, made after judgment, awarding counsel fees. The facts are stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Works.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an appeal from an order made after judgment allowing the appellant an attorney fee for services to be rendered in defense of a motion for a new trial and an appeal to this court. The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that there is no bill of exceptions, and that none of the proceedings and papers used on the hearing are properly authenticated. There is a certificate of the judge of the court below, which will be noticed hereafter, that certain papers named were used on the hearing.
In the case of Herrlich v. McDonald, 80 Cal. 472, it was said: “It is also a matter of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Nash v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Pieper v. Centinela Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Walsh v. HutchingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Larkin v. LarkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by21 opinions
- Linforth v. S.F. Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- San Diego Savings Bank v. GoodsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Rumney Land & Cattle Co. v. Detroit & Montana Cattle Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1897
- Shain v. EikerenkotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- State ex rel. Pierson v. MillisMontana Supreme Court · 1897
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.