People v. Schultz
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. George H. Cabaniss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
The defendant was charged by information with the crime of robbery, and with having, prior to the commission of said crime, suffered two convictions of the crime of burglary. On his arraignment he admitted the charge of prior convictions to be true, but pleaded not guilty to the charge of robbery. The jury, however, found him guilty of robbery as charged, and he has appealed to this court both from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The only points made for a reversal are insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, and the alleged error of the court in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. Ah Lee DoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. JanuaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. BreckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950