Legal Opinion

People v. Lonnen

California Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1903No. Crim. No. 992PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

The defendant was convicted of grand larceny, and appeals from the judgment of conviction and from an -order denying him a new trial. He also attempts to appeal from an order denying his motion in arrest of judgment and from the verdict of the jury, but these attempts not being authorized by our practice may be disregarded.

1. Appellant says that his motion to set aside the information on the ground that the defendant had not been legally -committed by a magistrate should have been granted by the -court. For want of a sufficient record we are unable to review the action of the court on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. FindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. BarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Isaac & Rebecca Thomas v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People v. BurnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. People v. ArlingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. LaparaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. People v. JermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. BoggessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State v. HolbrookOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. People v. CorlettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API