Legal Opinion

Javit v. Marshall's, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 6, 1996No. 13445PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendants after a trial to the court. The plaintiffs assert that the trial court improperly (1) granted the defendants’ motion to strike the plaintiffs’ case from the jury docket, (2) failed to find the execution of the lease to be merely a perfunctory act, (3) found that no enforceable contract existed between the parties, (4) found that no enforceable agreement to lease existed between the parties, (5) found that the defendants had not violated an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, (6) found that the defendants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Oil Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Masto v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Drahan v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Bradley v. RandallConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Connecticut Housing Finance Authority v. John Fitch Court Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Superior Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API