Legal Opinion

Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 7, 1995No. 12907PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendant relieving it of liability for the plaintiffs injuries sustained during his operation of a jack in the course of his employment. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly sustained the defendant’s objection to the plaintiff’s request for a jury trial.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The facts relating to this claim are as follows. The case began in 1986 when the plaintiff, Raymond Flint, initiated an action pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act; 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq.; alleging…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leahey v. HeasleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Kuser v. OrkisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Masto v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Rowan Construction Corp. v. HassaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Atta v. CutnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Javit v. Marshall's, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Flint v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Brown v. HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
  5. Carwin v. St. Vincent, No. Cv97 034 59 79 (Mar. 12, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API