Legal Opinion
Connecticut Housing Finance Authority v. John Fitch Court Associates Ltd. Partnership
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided March 4, 1996No. File CV930704331SPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HON. ROBERT SATTER, JUDGE TRIAL REFEREE.
Before the court in the present foreclosure action are three motions. The first is the plaintiffs motion to strike the defendants’ jury claim. The second is the defendants’ motion, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-218, that all issues of fact be tried to a jury. The third is the plaintiffs motion in the alternative, that if this court allows a jury trial on the defendants’ counterclaim, it will be severed from the plaintiffs foreclosure trial.
The relevant facts and pleadings are as follows. The plaintiffs original complaint alleged a deed and a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Savings Bank of New London v. SantanielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Berry v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Doris v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- National Bank of Commerce of New London v. HowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Lombardi v. LaudatiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dime Savings Bank v. Perlucci, No. Cv 96-0151353 S (Dec. 29, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Emerick v. ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020