Legal Opinion

Osmose Wood Preserving v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 23, 1992No. CA 91-472PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge.

This is an appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s order affirming and adopting the administrative law judge’s decision finding that appellee had contracted an occupational disease, histoplasmosis, during the course and scope of his employment with appellant and that he had become totally disabled as a result. On appeal, appellant contends that the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree and affirm.

In reviewing the Commission’s decision, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Deffenbaugh Industries & Travelers Insurance v. AngusCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Sanyo Manufacturing Corp. v. LeisureCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Willmon v. Allen Canning Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Hope Brick Works v. WelchCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  5. City of Fort Smith v. TateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Crossett School District v. GourleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Heptinstall v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Maxwell v. Carl Bierbaum, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Webb v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Harrington Construction Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API