Legal Opinion

Willmon v. Allen Canning Co.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 6, 1992No. CA 91-251PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melvin Mayfield, Judge.

Ilee Willmon has appealed a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission which dismissed her claim because “the claimant has failed to meet her burden of proof.”

Appellant’s first argument is that the Commission did not base its decision on a de novo review of the entire record and the case should be remanded. The Commission, after reciting • that it had conducted a de novo review of the entire record and finding that the appellant had failed to meet her burden of proof, affirmed and adopted the opinion of the law judge. In White v. Air Systems, Inc., 33 Ark. App.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Wright v. American TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Shippers Transport of Georgia v. SteppSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Silvicraft, Inc. v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Johnson v. HuxCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Fort Smith v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Williams v. Prostaff TemporariesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Crossett School District v. GourleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Weldon v. Pierce Bros. ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Crawford v. Pace IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API