Legal Opinion

City of Fort Smith v. Tate

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 27, 1992No. CA 91-430PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Elizabeth W. Danielson, Judge.

In this worker’s compensation case, appellants appeal the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission holding that appellants were responsible for the payment of the remarriage lump sum benefits under Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-527(d)(1) (1987). Appellee William Tate is deceased and it is his widow’s interest in benefits that are at issue here. We affirm the commission’s decision.

Tate was killed in January of 1981 during the course of his employment with the Fort Smith Police Department. He was survived by his wife, Anita, and two minor children. The claim was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Locke v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Arkansas Vinegar Co. v. AshbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Hanford Produce Co. v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  4. Cherry v. LeonardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Death & Permanent Total Disability Trust Fund v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Fort Smith v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Osmose Wood Preserving v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Farnsworth v. White County & Township of CypertCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2004
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API