Crossett School District v. Gourley
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
James R. Cooper, Judge.
The appellant appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding the appellee’s sinus difficulties a compensable occupational disease. On appeal, the appellant argues that the Commission erred in finding that the appellee proved by clear and convincing evidence that she suffered an occupational disease as defined in the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Act. We affirm.
In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings of the Workers’ Compensation Commission, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commission’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Fort Smith v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Sanyo Manufacturing Corp. v. LeisureCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Willmon v. Allen Canning Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Grimes v. North American FoundryCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
- Osmose Wood Preserving v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Mikel v. Engineered Specialty PlasticsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
- Liaromatis v. Baxter County Regional HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
- Bohannon v. Walmart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
- Heptinstall v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- Gourley v. Crossett Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.