Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Valdes v. Cory

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1983No. Civ. 21654PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

In consolidated original mandamus proceedings, various members of the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) and their employee organizations challenge, on constitutional and other legal grounds, the validity of certain provisions of chapter 115 of the Statutes of 1982. They seek peremptory writs of mandate to compel respondents, State Controller Kenneth Cory, the PERS Board of Administration (PERS Board), and the respective school employers of the school-employee petitioners, to perform their legal duties without regard to the challenged provisions of chapter 115. All…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Retired Employees Ass'n of Orange County, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Dadisman v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Harbor v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API