People v. Doherty
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
In a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.18, the respondent in this lawyer discipline case admitted that he neglected a legal matter entrusted to him. Under the conditional admission, the disciplinary counsel and the respondent stipulated to the imposition of a public censure. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, and recommended public censure. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.
I
The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1980.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. DohertySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re KetterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- In Re KetterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999