Legal Opinion

People v. Doherty

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 20, 1997No. 97SA290PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.18, the respondent in this lawyer discipline case admitted that he neglected a legal matter entrusted to him. Under the conditional admission, the disciplinary counsel and the respondent stipulated to the imposition of a public censure. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, and recommended public censure. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1980.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. DohertySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re KetterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  2. In Re KetterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API