Legal Opinion

Gayton v. Lebedina

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1958No. Civ. 22628PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tem. *

This action was instituted by plaintiffs-respondents, hereinafter called “Gaytons,” against defendants-appellants, “Lebedinas,” to enjoin the obstruction of a driveway by a steel fence and gate, for a mandatory injunction requiring removal of such obstruction and for damages therefor. The complaint is in two causes of action; the first alleging a recorded easement, an& the second, an easement by prescription based on open, notorious and adverse usage of the driveway by plaintiffs and their predecessors for more than 12 years past and without any fence, gate or other…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Sontag Chain Stores Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Colegrove Water Co. v. City of HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Safeway Stores v. City Council, San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Harry S. Cross, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API