Safeway Stores v. City Council, San Mateo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.
The appellant owns a piece of property on the southwesterly corner of San Mateo Drive and Poplar Avenue in the city of San Mateo. It is within a fourth residential zone, wherein stores are not permitted. Appellant’s application to respondent council for a reclassification of its property to commercial status was denied. A writ of mandate to compel the reclassification was then sought and denied, and this appeal was taken.
The central business district of San Mateo extends from El Camino Real on the west to and beyond the Southern Pacific on the east, a distance of about 5 blocks, and from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Rubin v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Rehfeld v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wheeler v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- McCarthy v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. CainWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Hamer v. Town of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Minney v. City of AzusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.