Legal Opinion
Bowerman v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 21, 2011No. 10-3500PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants are machine repairmen presently or formerly employed by Chrysler Group, L.L.C. or Daimler Chrysler Corporation (“Chrysler”) at two plants located in Toledo, Ohio. Plaintiffs claim that their union, defendants-appellees International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (“UAW”) and International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local No. 12 (“Local 12”),1 breached their duty of fair representation by favoring certain skilled workers — millwrights…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bowerman v. UAW LOCAL 12Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- McQuail v. Tennessee Technological UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2014
- Neal v. SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCYDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
- Drake v. RichersonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
- Alexander v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.