Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided March 23, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00044Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT ) LUCY ALEXANDER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil. No. 3:20-cv-00044-GFVT ) v. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS B. MILLER, et al., ) ) & Defendants. ) ORDER ) *** *** *** *** Plaintiffs Lucy Alexander, Mary Baughman, Robert Moody, Danny Metts, and Randall Roach assert that UK Healthcare and the Kentucky Department of Revenue’s billing and collection practices violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by failing to provide adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard. Plaintiffs argue that…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API