Legal Opinion
STATE Ex Rel ROBERTS v. GRUBER
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 25, 1962PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
Section 34 of the charter of the city of Toledo reads:
“Vacancies in elective offices of the City shall be filled by appointment by a majority of the entire membership of the council. * * *”
A member of the city council resigned and thereafter, according to a stipulation of the parties entered into in open court, the substance of which is recited in the findings of fact, “at a meeting of the Common Council of the City of Toledo, held on August 21, 1961, there being four Councilmen then present by a vote of three Councilmen, one Councilman abstaining, appoint or attempt to appoint the defendant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rushville Gas Co. v. City of RushvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Simmons v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State ex rel. Young v. YatesMontana Supreme Court · 1897
- Clark v. City Council of WalthamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Haines v. City of Forest GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Jensen v. TURNER COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Haven v. GreggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Meador-Brady Management Corp. v. Texas Motor Vehicle CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Dry Creek Valley Ass'n Inc. v. Bd. of Supervisors of Sonoma Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.