Legal Opinion

Simmons v. HOLM

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1961PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries brought by the plaintiff, Carroll Simmons, a minor, by Ms guardian, against defendants Holm. and. Yoland. Upon trial, verdict and judgment were for the defendants. Plaintiff appeals, and assigns 21 alleged errors.

The Engler-Huson Company, a corporation, was also a defendant, but the trial court granted a nonsuit as to it, and plaintiff has not appealed. We are not therefore concerned with the case against that defendant.

The complaint alleges the enactment by the city of Grants Pass of ordinances numbered 1130, 1133, 194 'and 281, setting…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Rudes v. GottschalkTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State Highway Commission v. Superbilt Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Bohm v. RacetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Russell v. Oregon R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. City of Stockton v. Frisbie & LattaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rosenau Ex Rel. Rosenau v. City of EsthervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Nielsen v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Alley v. SiepmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Bauman v. CrawfordWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Bixenman v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1968

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API