Legal Opinion

Clark v. City Council of Waltham

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 2, 1951PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The city of Waltham is governed by a Plan B charter, under which it has a mayor (G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 43, § 58) and eleven councillors (§ 59). By § 60, with certain immaterial exceptions, heads of departments are “appointed by the mayor, subject to confirmation by the city council.” The parties assume that the collector and treasurer of the city is the head of a department.

On January 22, 1951, the mayor appointed the petitioner Clark as collector and treasurer of the city. On February 12, 1951, the question of confirmation came up at a meeting, at which ten of the eleven councillors were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Rushville Gas Co. v. City of RushvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Pierce's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Merrill v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Locke v. Selectmen of LexingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Moskow v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Rock v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. First Church of Christ v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Sheahan v. School Committee of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Hawaii Electric Light Co. v. Department of Land & Natural ResourcesHawaii Supreme Court · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API