Central Surety & Insurance Corp. v. Hankins
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
NORVELL, Justice.
This action was brought by Hankins, appellee, against Central Surety and Insurance Corporation, appellant, as surety upon a bond executed in compliance with the Texas Agricultural Protective Act of 1937, Art. 1287 — 1, Vernon’s Tex.Ann.Civ.St., which is applicable only to the Texas Citrus Fruit Zone defined by Acts 1931, 42nd Leg., p. 838, Ch. 350, Art. 1700a — 2, Vernon’s Tex. Annotated Penal Code.
Palm Valley Canning Company, the principal upon the bond, was not made a party defendant, it being alleged that said company was insolvent, and had been adjudicated a bankrupt.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dunn v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- J. M. Radford Grocery Co. v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Rieger v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Standard Paint Co. v. San Antonio Hardware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stovall v. WhatleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- In re E.G.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- In Re EGM, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1983