Legal Opinion

Rieger v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1928No. 395PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickman, J.

The facts upon which this suit is based are somewhat complicated, but for the purpose of this opinion an abridged statement thereof will suffice. At the time of the making of the contract sued upon, appellant was an attorney at law residing at Desdemona. The appellees S. W. Smith and W. S. Birge were attorneys at law, practicing under the firm name of Smith & Birge at Desdemona. Appellant represented certain oil operators who were operating a small tract of land in Desdemona. Appellees Smith & Birge represented the owners of the land upon which, operations were being conducted, and also…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gandy v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Central Surety & Insurance Corp. v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Conn v. BelkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Bankers' Life & Loan Ass'n v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Wiedeman v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API