Legal Opinion

In re E.G.M.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 1983No. 04-81-00257-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTU, Justice.

This is a paternity suit brought by the Texas Department of Human Resources on behalf of R_ M_ and tried on February 21, 1980. The petition alleged that G- M_ was the biological father of the child E_ G_ M_, and sought to secure appropriate child support orders concerning the child. Trial was had to the court without a jury. The procedures involved in this and any suit to establish paternity are specifically set out in the Tex.Fam.Code Ann. §§ 13.01-13.09 (Vernon Supp.1982-1983).

Pursuant to court order the mother, alleged father, and the child submitted to blood tests…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gomez v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Little v. StreaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Choate v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Traylor v. GouldingTexas Supreme Court · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chisolm v. EakesMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. C.G.W. v. B.F.W.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Government of the Virgin Islands ex rel. Lloyd v. MaloneSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1987
  4. Bailey v. RichardsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Cgw v. Bfw, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API