Legal Opinion

Marcus v. Village of Mamaroneck

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 1940PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

This action is brought by the owners of one-family private dwellings to restrain violations of the Village Zoning Law. Special Term gave judgment for plaintiffs. The Appellate Division, second department, reversed Special Term on the law and facts, and dismissed the complaint, making certain new findings. The village of Mamaroneck, although named as a defendant, has not appealed from the judgment, and hereafter reference to defendants will be taken to mean the owners of a certain “ Beach club ” located in a Residence “A” Zone, in which are located the properties of plaintiffs.

The overwhelming…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rice v. Van VrankenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  2. Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Marcus v. Village of MamaroneckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Airco Alloys Division v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. In re the Estate of BarabashNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. MATTER OF HARBISON v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Weiss v. Mayflower Doughnut Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API