Legal Opinion
City of Aurora v. Acosta
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 6, 1995No. 94SC250PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey
dehvered the Opinion of the Court.
Respondents Acosta, Pullano, Roper and Hoffenberg, citizens and taxpayers of the City of Aurora, brought this action against the City of Aurora seeking invahdation of two voter-approved ballot issues, hmitation of the district’s spending base that was also approved by voters in a second ballot issue, declarative and injunctive relief regarding all future ballot questions, and an award of attorney’s fees. Respondents claimed that the ballot issues in question violated Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution (Amendment 1) by (1) failing to state a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bickel v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Carrara Place, Ltd. v. Arapahoe County Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Charlton v. KimataSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Meyer v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Erickson v. BlairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Zaner v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- In Re Interrogatories Relating to the Great Outdoors Colorado Trust FundSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Nicholl v. E-470 Public Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Bruce v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Havens v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.