Legal Opinion

In Re Interrogatories Relating to the Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 25, 1996No. 95SA392PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

This matter comes before us pursuant to Article VI, Section 3, of the Constitution of the State of Colorado. Under the authority of that section, the Governor of the State of Colorado has propounded three interrogatories to this court that concern the interpretation of Amendment 8, now Article XXVII of the Constitution of the State of Colorado. The interrogatories are:

Interrogatory No. One:

Whether payments made pursuant to Colo.Rev.Stat. § 33-60-103(1)(c) (1993), and to a 1992 refunding of certain obligations of the state enumerated therein, which exceed the payments on obligations described…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Colorado Ass'n of Public Employees v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Firelock Inc. v. District Court in & for the 20th Judicial District of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. In Re Interrogatories Propounded by the Senate Concerning House Bill 1078Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  4. People v. SchoondermarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. Urbish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Zaner v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Davidson v. SandstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  3. Huber v. COLORADO MINING ASS'NSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  4. Common Sense Alliance v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. Washington County Board of Equalization v. Petron Development Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API