Legal Opinion

Havens v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 23, 1996No. 95SC572PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

We granted certiorari before judgment, under C.A.R. 50, to review a judgment of the District Court for Archuleta County in favor of the Board of County Commissioners of Archuleta County (Board). 1 The district court held that article X, section 20, of the Colorado Constitution (Amendment 1) did not prohibit the County’s electorate from approving a referred measure authorizing re tention and expenditure of excess revenue collections which exceed Amendment 1 limits. Absent voter approval, Amendment 1 would have required refund of these revenues. Petitioner, F.T. Havens (Havens), contended that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bickel v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Central Hanover B. & T. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. Zaner v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. H. K. Porter Co. v. Metropolitan Dade CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Urbish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Barber v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. Davidson v. SandstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. Huber v. COLORADO MINING ASS'NSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. Aisenberg v. CampbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API