Havens v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
We granted certiorari before judgment, under C.A.R. 50, to review a judgment of the District Court for Archuleta County in favor of the Board of County Commissioners of Archuleta County (Board). 1 The district court held that article X, section 20, of the Colorado Constitution (Amendment 1) did not prohibit the County’s electorate from approving a referred measure authorizing re tention and expenditure of excess revenue collections which exceed Amendment 1 limits. Absent voter approval, Amendment 1 would have required refund of these revenues. Petitioner, F.T. Havens (Havens), contended that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bickel v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Central Hanover B. & T. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Zaner v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- H. K. Porter Co. v. Metropolitan Dade CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Urbish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Barber v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Davidson v. SandstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Huber v. COLORADO MINING ASS'NSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Aisenberg v. CampbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.