Legal Opinion
Bickel v. City of Boulder
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 11, 1994No. 94SA130PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey
Plaintiffs, citizens and taxpayers of the City and the County of Boulder, brought this action 1 against defendants City of Boulder (City), County of Boulder (County) and Boulder Valley School District RE-2 (School District, and, collectively, the governmental entities) seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and the invalidation of several ballot issues proposed by the defendants and ultimately adopted by the electorate at the November 2, 1993, general election. Plaintiffs claimed that the ballot issues in question violated several provisions of Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- People ex rel. Elder v. SoursSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
- Evans v. RomerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Ingram v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- People ex rel. Johnson v. EarlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Zaner v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Nicholl v. E-470 Public Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Huber v. COLORADO MINING ASS'NSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Common Sense Alliance v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- In Re the Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause, & Summary With Regard to a Proposed Petition for an Amendment to the Constitution of the State Adding Subsection (10) to Section 20 of Article XSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.