Zaner v. City of Brighton
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kirshbaum
In Zaner v. City of Brighton, 899 P.2d 263 (Colo.App.1995), the court of appeals affirmed a judgment entered by the trial court in favor of defendant-respondent City of Brighton (the city) and intervenor-respon-dent United Power, Inc. (United Power) and against plaintiffs-petitioners Suzan Zaner and Ray Owens (plaintiffs) determining that a special election held by the city to obtain voter approval for the transfer of the city’s utility franchise did not violate article X, section 20, of the Colorado Constitution entitled “The Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights.” 1 Having granted certiorari to review…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. ZapotockySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Bickel v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. JanousekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- In Re Interrogatories Propounded by the Senate Concerning House Bill 1078Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Urbish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Davidson v. SandstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Lobato v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Submission of Interrogatories on House Bill 99-1325Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Colorado Ethics Watch v. Senate Majority Fund, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- Grossman v. DeanColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.