Legal Opinion

Lowells v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 2017No. 1202172; A155678PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, C. J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the workers’ compensation board holding that her chronic pain disorder is not compensable as an occupational disease, because its major contributing cause are factors personal to claimant, such as her weight, deconditioning, and history of chronic tobacco use. Because it concluded that claimant’s work was not the major contributing cause of her chronic back pain, the board did not expressly address whether that pain constituted an occupational disease. On judicial review, claimant contends that the board erred in considering factors personal to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. SpurgeonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Corkum v. Bi-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Portland Adventist Medical Center v. BuckallewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Multnomah County v. ObieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Bowen v. Fred Meyer StoresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Saif Corp. v. Dunn (In re Comp. of Dunn)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Rogers v. CorVel Enterprise Comp, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Johnston v. Gordon Trucking - Heartland ExpressCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API