Morier v. Hines
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtParsons, C. J.
The cases were tried together. The jury found against Adelard, the driver of the motor cycle, and in favor of Eva, the passenger. They must therefore have found that both the defendant and Adelard were negligent and that despite Adelard’s negligent driving of the car, the defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of Eva’s injury. The jury were properly instructed that Adelard’s negligence in driving should not be imputed to Eva. In other words, Eva, herself free from fault, was not debarred from recovery because Adelard’s negligent driving contributed in some degree to cause the injury.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Currier v. McKeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904
- Cosgrove v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Sublett v. Mobile & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
3Cited by13 opinions
- Collette v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
- Morrison v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
- Peppin v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
- Tetreault v. GouldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- Phillips v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.