Legal Opinion

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Crook

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 5, 1931No. 4 Div. 542PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The suit is by the ultimate consumer of a bottle of Coca-Cola against the bottling company for personal injuries charged to the negligence of defendant in allowing a foreign substance injurious to health to be sealed up in the bottle.

“The presence of foreign matter deleterious to health sealed up in a bottle of soft drink is evidence of negligence.” Try-Me Beverage Co. v. Harris, 217 Ala. 302, 116 So. 147, 148.

• Appellant insists the affirmative charge was due defendant for want of proof that the foreign substance in this bottle was deleterious to health.

Plaintiff testified it was a solid…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Try-Me Beverage Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  2. Tafoya v. Las Cruces Coca-Cola Bottling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Kirkland v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Collins Baking Co. v. SavageSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Reichert Milling Co. v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API