Legal Opinion

Tafoya v. Las Cruces Coca-Cola Bottling Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1955No. 5826PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGHEE, Justice.

A verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on complaint in tort alleging the pus-chase and partial consumption of a bottled beverage containing foreign matter resulting in illness and damage to plaintiff, Rosario Tafoya, for the sum of $300 is the subject of attack on appeal by defendant.

Defendant’s first point asserts as error the denial by the trial court of its motions for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs’ case and at the close of the whole case. The bulk of argument under this point is that the plaintiffs did not establish actionable negligence because…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Bottling Works v. SullivanTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Rozumailski v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Hepp v. Quickel Auto & Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Gantt v. Columbia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  5. Eisenbeiss v. PayneArizona Supreme Court · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Archibeque v. HomrichNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Thompson v. Burke Engineering Sales Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  3. Renfro v. JD Coggins CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Buchanan v. DowningNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Tuso v. MarkeyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API